Monday, June 29, 2009

Similar logo...

I stumbled across a photographer that is using a logo very similar to my design. I'm sure it is just coincidence. It's not like my logo is some "one of a kind" super-rare design. It's clean, simple, and to the point... probably why someone else is using the same approach.

This is mine, and has been for around twelve years now:


This is her website, where you can see her logo:


Anyway, I'm not crying foul here. I'm sure someone else had a very similar design before me. I'm sure more people will try something like this in the future. I'm just blogging about it, because it caught my eye.

Labels:

Just re-shoot it!!!

This is one of those situations where you just need to hire a photog to re-shoot your cover. There is no excuse for such a lame attempt at Photoshop photo-chopping...


Seriously.

Labels:

Don't forget...

Don't forget to make time for your personal photos. Take pictures of your family and friends, get them printed, and put them in a real scrapbook or album. It will do a lot to help clear your head. It will make you a better shooter. Don't forget to take time for yourself and your personal photos every week. Even if it just means looking back through your photo album. Trust me. It will make you feel better.

Sunday, June 28, 2009

About half a second of backside...

Sometimes stories are held for a while... a long while.  A few months back, I was assigned to do a video story for blackwhiteread.com on some storm sewer spelunkers.  While I was there, I was surprised/happy to see Randy Grothe on assignment for the DMN.  

My video ran shortly after the assignment, but Randy said they were holding his for a while.  You see, if a story isn't time-sensitive, publications will occasionally hold onto them.  It helps provide content on slower news days, and makes room for more important breaking news stories.  I've done stories for publication that have been held for months before...  

Well, Today's DMN finally has Randy's video piece online, with a fun story by contributing writer Page Phelps and photo intern Cody Duty.  Why do I bring up Randy's video?  First, because Randy is super-cool, and second because you can see my backside for about half a second if you watch really carefully.  I know, not exactly my best and biggest "cameo", but it still brings back memories of that fun, dirty, slimy day.  

Here's a link to Randy's video:  


Here is a link to the one I shot:  


and a follow-up story with some of my photos:  

Labels: ,

Friday, June 26, 2009

Building an album cover...

I accidentally stumbled across this page while researching a client that contacted me. They had a blog with a link to something cool, and that had a cool link, which had a cool link, which led to this random page:


I just thought it was neat to see how they built the set for this album cover. They don't show how they lit it, but you could study the disco balls if you were that curious...

Labels:

Farrah Fawcett photo shoot...

The story behind Farrah Fawcett's iconic photo shoot:

http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1907185,00.html

read the above article for a little photo inspiration.

Labels:

NY Times Photo Editor...

Someone directed me to this link:


I was surprised to see some interesting questions and answers. The assistant managing editor for the Times - Michele McNally - was supposed to answer reader questions in this series. I expected a lot of fluff and crap. Not so. There are several good photo-related questions, and topics about the future of photo and multi-media stories.

Labels:

Think about what you need...

I mentioned a lot of recent business spending in a previous post. This month has been a bit crazy. I don't usually drop a few grand on new camera bodies every month. Actually, I have budgeted to purchase a new body every two years.

I also don't spend a lot on computer stuff. I will have to get a new hard drive or two, maybe every six months or so (they fill up fast). I will have to add memory when needed, maybe increasing it every year until the computer is maxed out. But, I try not to get a new computer until I have to (because a machine has died or the newest needed software won't run on my current machine).

Well, I've been lucky enough to buy my last two Powermacs used. One at an auction for a few hundred bucks - it lasted me a few years. The other through ebay - it's still running fine, and has been for the last three or four years now. It just runs a little slow on some things and won't really work with Adobe CS4 or the newest version of Final Cut Pro.

Believe it or not, I've been able to get by on this G4 dual 533mhz Powermac for the last few years. It cost me around $400 to $500 and maybe a couple hundred dollars in upgrades to keep it going so far. No three or four grand Intel-based powerhouse for me... Why would I spend that kind of money if I don't HAVE to?!?

You see, all this gear is just a set of tools to help me create my art. I'm not afraid to say that I didn't go to Apple and spend a few grand for a new unit, plus another grand in memory and other hop-ups. I am not using my computer to impress other people, and I'm not using it to do hardcore 3D rendering or major motion picture video editing. It doesn't HAVE to be the newest, fastest, flagship model computer.

My new computer purchase is for a older Powermac Quadcore 2.5ghz computer. I figure that will be just enough to get me by for the next three to four years, until I have to find another used unit that is "just quick enough" and "just modern enough" to be relevant for the next few years after that.

I am fine with a machine that is already a few years old. It will work with the most current software out today, and it will run fast enough and smooth enough for what I am currently doing - and plan to be doing for the next couple years. That's all I ask for.

Here's the deal, I spent $1,100 for the newer computer. If I add in another $400 in upgrades over the next four years, I'll have spent $1,500 on this computer overall. Divide that by the years of use and I'm spending $375 per year on my computer to use it. That $375 per year operating cost is on par with what you'd spend per year on a new, but very basic basic Intel-based Mac Pro, if you kept it for the next eight years.

And, just to compare the cost of operating the best, fastest, hottest, newest Mac currently available: If you purchased an 8-core Intel-based Mac pro (runs two 2.93ghz quadcore chips) with 16gb memory for $6,500, you'd need to keep running that machine for almost 18 years to reach the same $375 per year cost!

Sure, there are advantages to getting the newest, biggest computer currently available. I'm not suggesting you should always buy used. I'm really just pointing out that you should get what you need, with some room to grow for a few years. However, you are just wasting money if you don't really need it, won't actually use it, and especially can't afford it.

Thursday, June 25, 2009

An expensive month...

So, June was very profitable, but also very costly. Just part of doing business, I guess. Let's break it down:

* new Canon 5D mkII with some misc accessories: $3,000
* repair my original Canon 5D: $400
* repair my BeachTek audio device for my video camera: $150
* replace some old rechargeable batteries for my flash: $85
* buy a newer Powermac for the office: $1,100
* buy new CF cards: $150

Maybe not a lot of money to some people, but I'd rather not spend so much if I can help it. Hopefully, this gives you an idea of all the things you need to consider when running your own business. If something breaks, you can't just send it off to the IT department or have the company buy you a new one. You need to factor in all these upgrades and repairs when you are bidding on jobs. You have to pay for it somehow...

Space sheep?!?

Thank goodness I've never had a client ask me to do a shoot like this before:

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Time for new batteries...

My AA nimh rechargeable batteries just aren't holding up like they used to. No surprise, since I've had them for close to FIVE years now. Yeah, they lasted that long with regular use in my cameras and flashes.

I was told about a company called Thomas Distributing that carried the Maha/Powerex brand a long time ago, and I decided to try them out. One of the best moves I ever made. If you want reliable batteries and chargers, go here:


Look around all you want, but when you are done browsing, get these batteries:


...and this charger:


Though, I must admit, this charger looks pretty cool (I haven't ever used it, though):


I am hoping to get another five years out of my new batteries. I hope the Powerex brand is still just as good as it was when I got my last batch.

Labels:

Monday, June 22, 2009

zzzzzzz...

Yes, I am so tired and about to hit the bed hard. I'm also a bit sunburned and very sore all over. But, it was worth it, because we got some GREAT photos for the next BFS record.

The art director, who flew in from NY, told me that he handled the artwork on all the Modest Mouse 7" singles out right now. I'm already a Modest Mouse fan, and had considered picking up the records. Now I definitely want one!!!

That's it for now. I'll post again when I get caught up with everything (which feels like never at the moment).

Sunday, June 21, 2009

No new posts...

Sorry, but you probably won't hear much from me for a few days. I've been slammed with shoots all weekend and am doing another major label album cover shoot all day Monday. Then, the next few days will be filled with even more shoots, probably until next saturday or Sunday. In other words, don't expect any new posts this week.

If I do post, it may just be a quick tidbit, because I really have a ton of work to get through. But, I promise to post any interesting photo related things I come across if I have time. Oh, I did get two Holga cameras for ten bucks each today. Plus, I found a propack of 120 film in an old bag tonight. Makes me want to bust out one of the Holgas (I have four now - got my first one in 1996 or so) and take a few artistic pics...

Labels:

Saturday, June 20, 2009

Eight sides are better than four...

If I wasn't saving money to update my computer, I'd buy this today:



Labels:

Friday, June 19, 2009

Father's Day gift for the photographer...

Check these out: 

  

I'm sure it's too late to order these for your photog father, seeing as how father's day is tomorrow.  However, that doesn't mean you can't get a head start on your Christmas shopping!  These came from www.cufflinks.com and are made very well.  They are made from a heavy metal and the black coating (enamel, maybe?) seems very durable and shiny.  

Normally, I'm not into the novelty cufflinks, but these ones seem just low key enough for me.  I think I'll wear them tonight...

Labels:

Flower power...

I had a photo shoot this morning and work in the office/studio during the afternoon. However, my evening was spent hanging out with the boys outside in the backyard. They played with their toys and I played with mine - mine being the Canon 5D mkII, a 50mm f/1.4 and some macro extension tubes. You'd be surprised at what you can find in your own yard, if you look close enough...





Labels:

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Free God...

Some like it hot...

I had to go out last Saturday night and get some shots for the cover of Quick's pool feature. It basically highlights some pretty cool bars that also off a pool to play in. Well, it was quite a hot and sticky evening, but my Canon 5D mkII and I braved the oven-like weather and came back with this shot:


For those of you more interested in the geeky technical stuff than the girl in the bikini, I'll fill you in...

Camera - Canon 5D mkII
ISO Rating - 4000
Mode - Manual
Shutter Speed - 1/8 sec
Aperture - f/5.0
Lens - 16-35mm f/2.8L (used at 16mm for the image)
Flash - 580ex, set to auto minus 1 stop, zoomed into either 35 or 50mm (I forget exactly)

Image taken at 11:37pm in downtown Dallas, by the way.

Labels:

A few mentions...

So, I was told that my name popped up a few more times recently, here and there. I'll share the links:


The above link lists me as being "talented", which is very flattering, I must say. It's a whole lot better than being called the "average" or "sucky" photographer, which would not be so flattering!


Not really a shout out in the body of the story, but the cutline very clearly points out my efforts on the new Rhett Miller disc. Very nice to receive more than just the standard "photo by" credit.


Not quite a "mention", but more like a picture of my backside.

Oh, and I forgot to go download that radio show podcast from a couple weeks ago where i was mentioned. I'm going to go track that down right now...

Labels:

Multimedia Journalists take note...

This is a good little article to read if you want to know where the money is:


Newspapers and traditional media are scaling back, and in some cases, closing up shop all together. This article gives a good perspective on other avenues where a multimedia journalist (photog, writer, blogger, videographer, etc... all wrapper up in one) can go to continue his/her trade. I read the story in print, in the current issue of PDN earlier this month. However, I thought the online version was worth linking to, after reading David Leeson's comments regarding the story:

An informative article by PDN writer David Walker about life after newspapers. I loved my life as a newspaper photojournalist. I experienced a privileged life, where wealth was not measured by a bank account but rather in the diverse riches of human experience.

I am not a daily newspaper photographer anymore but the good news for me is that I have been able to remain a photojournalist. My camera is capable of recording motion and sound with video.

For me, and many others, a new era of photojournalism is before us. There is no equal to the power of the still image but it is equally beautiful to produce "images" that move and speak.

Labels:

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

My art helped save a dog...

I donated a piece of art to the Cash For Cash event. It raised some money to help a friend with his dog Cash's vet bills. You can see the event (and me about 1:20 into the video on the right side of the screen) by clicking here:

Labels:

Bad weather video...

That's right. I did another video. It covers the recent storm damage that our community had to deal with:



Labels:

Protection...

I sort of rambled my way through the last post, covering important areas of interest before the actual shoot. I looked at it from the view of a major label album shoot, since that's what I'm most familiar with. However, I can tell you that it also applies to a big commercial shoot, or almost any production that is worth several thousand dollars or more.

Since I was just going over details off the top of my head, I'm sure I missed a few important things to remember. One thing I forgot to mention is the importance of contracts. You'll be buried in paperwork that needs to be signed. You'll send over an estimate and/or invoice, a w-9, a signed contract that was probably bounced back and forth a few times during negotiations, and releases.

You'll need to get all the models to sign a release. It basically says that you are allowed to use their likeness for commercial and editorial use. You'll need to get any private location to sign a release. It allows you to use their land and building without fear of being sued for trespassing. You may also have a separate "gag order" contract for everyone on set to sign. In other words, they aren't allowed to discuss any of the shoot details until after the end product is released.

Hope you planned on printing out a ton of these, getting them signed, scanning them in to save with the digital files, and storing the originals (or sending them along with the client, depending upon your rights agreement). This all takes time, and time is money...

Labels:

Monday, June 15, 2009

How to handle busy...

I haven't blogged in a little while, because I've been pretty busy.  Besides my regular clients, I've had a few extra shoots to squeeze into my schedule.  Plus, I've been dealing with the massive amounts of planning that come with a major record label album cover shoot.  

I figured this would be a good topic to discuss.  You can find all sorts of great blogs and web tutorials about proper lighting, but rarely do you hear about the before and after parts of a shoot.  Let me tell you this:  The bigger the shoot, the bigger the pay, and the bigger the amount of pre and post work that has to be done.  You NEED to factor this into your budget.  

Let me run down the list of things that you will most likely be responsible for during a major label shoot worth thousands to tens of thousands of dollars (depending on the popularity of the artist).  Some things you will delegate to other people on your team, but you are still responsible to make sure it happens.  

First, you will need to hire a photo assistant.  You don't want to waste time moving lights or messing with little things when you could be discussing details with the band or the art director.  You could be visualizing your next shot or looking over images already shot.  A photo assistant is there to move things, set up things, watch things, and basically be an extra set of hands, eyes, and ears for you.  Labels out of New York expect you to have one and won't mind seeing the fee on your invoice.  

These days, you may also have a digital tech on set.  With the added hassle of downloading and backing up images, previewing images, and all the other junk associated with digital photography, this person will be a necessity.  The digi tech will be taking all your CF cards and manning the computer, making sure all your precious images are safe.  

Next is the make-up artist and/or stylist.  I say and/or, because you might only need one or you might need both.  For easy-going rock bands, I usually just get a stylist who knows a little about taking shine off skin and fixing up some stray hairs.  It saves several hundred dollars that a make-up artist would add into the mix.  However, some shoots will keep a stylist so busy with clothing, accessories, and other styling prep work.... some shoots may require specialized or excessive make-up skill.  These are the shoots to hire both.  

Who is handling catering?!?  For all my album shoots, I've just had to pack a cooler with some drinks and a basket with some snacks.  Every once in a while, you may be working on such a big production that you will hire a separate catering company to deal with this.  I've done it for a huge multi-day advertising shoot, but most bands just want snacks and drinks on set.  

Props?!?  Did someone say props?  Yes, you will work with your stylist and art director to find and approve all the items you need for the shoot.  My shoot coming up next week requires a big sheet birthday cake with a certain phrase written on it.  Who is going to order it and pick it up?  Most of the time, it will be you.  It could also be your assistant or your stylist, depending on the amount you are paying them.  

Where are you shooting?  The last time I shot this band, I had them come to Dallas and I had some pretty good ideas in my head of where to go.  I still had to spend a day driving around and getting images of the places to share with the label in New York, so they could give final approval.  This day needs to be factored into your fee, or you are basically working that day for free.  

There is another option, and that is to hire a location scout.  These people will be extra handy if you are flying into a different city to shoot.  You may not arrive with enough time to scout the area, or you may be too busy shooting for other clients to take a day off of shooting to scout.  Scouts cost money, but can be useful.  

OK, so the what, when, where, and who are all taken care of.   Wait a minute...  We have the "behind the lens" who figured out, and we know the band will be the who in front of the camera, but what about... extras?  Yup, you may be asked to cast any extras for the shoot.  That takes time, sometimes a lot of time.  Luckily, the band is casting the extras for this upcoming shoot.  That saves me hours of calling around and meeting with or auditioning people.  

Oh, did we discuss what you are shooting with?  No??  Did you discuss it with the label???  No????  Guess what... every client has slightly different needs and expectations from you.  This one wants me to shoot RAW, but also give them TIFF conversions.  Some may ask for a minimum file size.  Some may expect you to be shooting medium format digital.  And that's just the tip of the iceberg.  

What about lighting?  Do you have everything you need?  Are you shooting away from an electrical outlet and need to rent a generator or battery-powered strobes?  I've rented a Profoto 7B pack in the past so I could have studio quality lighting and still be 100% battery-powered to go anywhere during the shoot.  Of course, I have my own Profoto brand kit these days, but what if I needed to rent extra heads or an extra power pack?  

You need to factor in the time and money to rent the gear, even considering the time it took to drive down to the photo district and pick up the stuff.  If you are shooting over the weekend, you need to go pick up the rental gear on Friday.  Are you able to take time out of your schedule to do it?   I hope so, or you'll be paying an assistant to do it for you or an extra day of rental fee to pick it up early.  

Think you have all the pre-shoot figured out now?  Nope, not even close.  Most likely, unless you live in NY or LA, you will do all your planning by phone and email.  Heck, even if you are in the same city, you will still probably do 90% of the planning via phone conferences and emails.  You know what happens?  A bunch of talking that takes even more time.  A bunch of emails to read and respond to.  And I mean a BUNCH!!!  This label is planning to make hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions, off this band.  They are going to be bugging you night and day, bombarding you with questions and comments, making sure things are perfect.  

For my one day of scheduled shooting next week, I've probably already spent a full day of reading emails and making phone calls each week.  I have dealt with at least a hundred emails over the last few days from a million different people.  Several label execs, the art director, a few of the band members, my stylist, other people I hired, the band's management, some guy who is making some clothing for the shoot, the location contact, and on and on and on.  

I'll stop there, because this is pretty long now.  There is a bunch of post-shoot stuff to deal with, but I'll save that for another day.  The point was to make sure you understand what goes into a shoot that might bill the cost of a new car or more.  The photog didn't just come up with a magical number and grab his point and shoot.  That photog earned every penny through a TON of work for a handful of final images.  

If you land a big gig like this, you had better start asking what the budget is, what the shoot ideas are, and a million of the questions covered above, so you can accurately figure out the REAL cost of taking the pictures.  If they say you will be given five grand for the shoot and all image rights, then expect you to eat four grand in production costs (assistants, location fees, catering, make-up and props, etc), you might be getting ripped off.  If they say you will get a five grand creative fee, you retain your copyright, plus get to bill ALL the expenses to them, you might be able to pull something like this off and still feed your family at the end of the day...

Labels:

Friday, June 12, 2009

A helpful chart...

Wanting to buy new CF cards to feed your hungry Canon 5D mkII, but don't know which card works best? Look here:


Not all CF cards are alike, and write speed is important when you are trying to stuff those big files onto a card in a timely manner. I just got some new Sandisk Extreme III 8 gig cards, and they seem to be working OK in the camera. I'm going to read over the list and see where they land...

Labels:

www.cinema5d.com

I just discovered this forum...  


Video is not my strong point, so I'm still learning.  Actually, I have an absolute TON to learn.  I've got a basic process down with my camcorder and Final Cut Pro, but I'm not really all that efficient yet.  And now that I have awesome video capability on the Canon 5D mkII, I have even more to learn.  

Most of the stuff being talked about on the forum goes over my head, but I'm still excited to know that I have a place to discuss 5D mkII video tips, FCP importing and editing suggestions, and other misc video questions.  

Labels:

The beauty of Canon...

So, get this...  I got my 5D camera body back from Canon.  I sent it off last Friday with a broken shutter (look for my previous post about how I destroyed it).  I sent it two day Fedex, so they would've received it on Tuesday of this week.  Well, I just got it back today - Friday, one week after I sent it - and that includes my slow shipping!  

Talk about fast service!!!  But, that's not all.  There's more tale to tell...  

So, I'm a member of Canon's CPS.  It stands for Canon Pro Services.    You have to actually apply and show proof that you are a pro shooter, with minimum gear purchases and tear sheets proving you shoot for real and aren't just some weekend warrior or soccer mom.  I've been a CPS member for years now.  

A while back, I got a certificate for $100 off any CPS service.  However, I let it expire a good six months ago and never used it.  Well, I put it in with my broken camera and crossed my fingers, hoping they would ignore the expiration date.  They went ahead and took my certificate, even though they didn't HAVE to.  How nice/cool/awesome is that?!?  

It was pretty important that I got the extra $100 off, because it turned out that only the parts were $300.  There was still $300 in labor to deal with.  I was originally assuming a $300 total bill, after the 20% discount that CPS members get.  The total wound up being (with misc shipping, tax, etc) about $650, minus the $120 for my CPS 20% discount, minus the $100 from my certificate.

That extra $100 certificate made the cost a little easier to bear.  $430 vs $530 (or $650 if I weren't a CPS member), I'll always take the $430 charge!  Of course, I'd prefer a zero dollar charge, but that just wasn't possible here.

Canon is so cool.  fast service, really great customer care, and great products to begin with.  I needed a company to love, and Canon came to the rescue!!!  

Labels:

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

It's official: my computer is old...

I tried to work on some test video from the new Canon 5D mkII today.  It shoots some outrageous HD video!  Only one problem... my computer just can't keep up with rendering all that video.  In Final Cut Pro, a regular chunk of video would take about ten seconds to render.  The same chunk in HD was ten minutes!!!  

I'm gonna switch the camera to non-HD for now.  If I take normal, non-HD video, the computer can digest it.  And all my video stuff appears tiny on the web, so HD isn't a priority yet.  Not to mention that a 4 gig card got filled up in 13 minutes of shooting HD video.  I don't even know where I'd store all the files after a few video shoots.  I'd be trying to store about twelve gigs of video per shoot, which adds up to a lot of hard drive space QUICK!!!!!  

I'll get this all figured out soon enough and report back.  But I will say this... The initial video I just shot has me thinking the 5D mkII will be a pretty cool piece of equipment in the war on documentary video!

Labels:

Rhett and I are getting some press...

So, it's no big shocker that Rhett Miller's new album is getting critical acclaim.  It is great, so why wouldn't it?  Rolling Stone gave it four stars!  Can you believe that?!?  They are pretty frugal with those stars, so anything above three with them is like gold.  

Bu they aren't the only ones talking about it.  Every important local and national publication has had a glowing review of the album so far.  The cool thing is that I'm actually getting some press off of this, too!  It's rare for people to interview the photographer of an album, so it's nice to get some love.  Look here:  

http://blog.quickdfw.com/archives/2009/06/rhett-millers-new-album-cover.html#more  


Also, I've been name dropped a couple times.  Once in this CD review:  


And finally, Rhett name dropped me this morning, during his on air interview Tuesday, June 9, 2009, on The Ticket.  It's Sportsradio 1310 The Ticket, but they talk about a lot more than just sports.  They have podcasts up on iTunes, but they run a few days behind the live content.  Realistically, this one should be available to download on Friday, I think...  

I just think it's cool that I'm getting some love for my effort on this project.  Rhett did such a great job, and I was glad to be a part of it!  Now, go out and buy a copy!  Or, don't go out when you can order it online, like here:  

Labels:

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Canon 5D mkII and Me: A Love Story...

OK, so I have had the new Canon 5D mkII for half a day so far.  I think I am in love!!!  I haven't put it through its paces yet, but I'll have plenty of time to do that in the near future with my upcoming magazine shoots and my next major label album cover shoot later this month...  

This is by no means a very scientific test.  It is me taking some images around the house with the new Canon 5D mkII and nothing more.  If you want one of those "technical" reviews, there are plenty of them available on other websites.  Hopefully, this will give you a good idea of what the 5D mkII can do on an average day of shooting.  

The big thing I wanted to test out was its high ISO image quality.  I tried to find several scenarios where a higher ISO was needed to see if the images held up or not.  On my old 5D (the original, or mkI, I suppose), I could get useable images at 1600 ISO, but mainly you'd want to stay at or below 800 ISO if possible.  1000, 1250, and 1600 ISO were just a bit too noisy for best quality.  With the mkII's ability to shoot at up to 25600 ISO (wow!!!), I needed to see how it REALLY looked at high ISO values...


Of course the first thing I'm going to shoot with my new camera is going to be my boys!  The room was kind of dark, so I cranked up the camera to XX ISO and shot a couple frames.  Looking at the image at 100% in Photoshop, it holds up well.  The mkII's 6400 ISO looks like the grain from a roll of good quality 800 ISO film.  It has a very pleasing digital grain/noise to it in the mids and highlight areas.  I'll have to test it more in the shadows to see how it REALLY holds up.  That's where digital grain/noise can look bad.  



I decided to go out to the garden and test the camera out more.  I wanted to see how it would do with colors and details... really, I just wanted to shoot anything and everything I could find!  This camera is addictive.



I loved the way the water was dripping off this tiny tomato.  The garden was shaded at the time, and the macro extension tube means more light loss, so the Canon 5D mkII came in handy.  This image was shot at 1000 ISO, but looks more like 400 ISO.  The mkII allows you to bump the camera up to 1600 ISO and still shoot beautiful images.  Its 1600 ISO looks like the original 5D's 640 ISO... it's that good!



This is a section of the above picture at 100% and 10"x10" at 72 ppi, so you can view the detail.  



I loved the color of tiny little cherry tomatoes.  Image details were 1/320 sec, 9.0f, 3200 ISO.



This is a section of the above picture at 100% and 10"x10" at 72 ppi, so you can really see the detail available.  Can you believe this was shot at 3200 ISO?!?  Not too bad...  



I saw these ants walking across a flower, so I thought I'd see just what the Canon 5D mkII, an 85mm 1.8f lens, and an extension tube could do.  This is still cropped in from the original image quite a bit, but the huge file size of the mkII makes that less of an issue.  There was still enough of a file left to make a good print.  Besides being cropped, this image received a bit of sharpening in Photoshop to help bring out some of the details.  



Playing around, I decided to take a picture of a cactus.  I cropped this image to square in Photoshop, but no sharpening or other manipulation was done.


This image was taken at 1/100 sec, 3.2f, 6400 ISO in a somewhat dark area of the house.  I'll have to say that the 5D mkII seems to be holding its own so far!!!



The image below was taken at 12,800 ISO in a dark living room.  I could've NEVER taken this image with my old 5D camera...  The 5D mkII can do so much more with so much less light.  It is amazing!  yeah, it is a bit grainy, but what do you expect for 12,800 ISO?!?  It looks at good as other camera's 1600 ISO.



I have never been able to get this cat to sit still in a brightly lit location.  Finally, I was able to get a decent image in a softly-lit corner of a room.  Enough window light was coming in that the mkII worked fine.  This image, when blown up to 100%, looks like 1600 ISO on the original 5D.  It has some digital grain, but it's not the end of the world.  Of course, this wasn't shot at 1600 ISO... nope, it was shot at 6400 ISO on the mkII.  Yup, the Canon mkII's XX ISO looks as good as the 5D's 1600 ISO!  I cropped the image to square and added a bit of sharpening in Photoshop to bring out the fur and whiskers.



The image below was taken at the highest ISO setting possible on the camera.  If you go into custom functions, you can turn on high 1 & 2, which goes up to an insane 25,600 ISO!!!  Sure, it is super-nasty as far as grain is concerned, but it's better than getting no image at all.  The lack of light in the room when this was taken was nuts!  It was too dark to focus.  It was movie theater dark.  It was just plain dark.  But I got something which could be printed... perfect for spot/breaking news stories where an image might be taken in less-than-perfect visual conditions (like the sewer system story I recently did).  Details: 1/40 sec, 1.4f, 25,600 ISO. Canon 5D mkII and Canon 50mm 1.4f lens.


Labels:

Monday, June 8, 2009

What is it with PDF's, anyway?!?

I slacked off a bunch over the last couple years, because I had so much good work coming in.  I didn't really have to show my portfolio, because I was already getting enough people calling me!  Well, I'm sure you've noticed that things aren't the same as they used to be, thanks to the economy.  

I don't have the luxury of sitting around and waiting for the phone to ring.  I have to send out promos and portfolios.  I have to knock on doors and actually market myself again.  It's not that bad, I guess.  It's just part of the business.  

I will say this about today's marketing:  Things have changed over the last couple of years.  Everyone I ask about seeing my book says, "Do you have it on PDF?"  Everyone I call about sending over a portfolio says, "Can you send me a PDF?"  Everyone that says they would love to see something from me, follows up by saying, "Send me a PDF."  

When/why did things change so fast?  Is it the ability to view work from laptops, PDA's, and cellphones?  Is it the ability to ignore the bad/boring books without a face to face meeting or a follow-up call to pick up a physical book?  Is it the ability to glance through several submissions faster than flipping through real pages could ever do?  

Whatever the case, I've sent out several PDF's lately.  I guess it saves me money of printing costs, but it just seems less personal.  Touching a page, thumbing through images, stopping and looking at a beautiful image as light hits the paper...  

I say all this as I listen to a vinyl record and wrap up my business day to take my boys outside to actually play and run around.  I'll send those virtual pictures, but I will mourn the death of the printed portfolio.  

By he way, I started sending this basic promo as a PDF, but I guess I'll need to build a full portfolio to email out.  Hopefully, this gives potential clients enough of a taste...  maybe enough that they'll actually request an old school printed portfolio?  

Labels:

Saturday, June 6, 2009

The moon...

  

I love the moon.  It is so beautiful.  Since I am shooting with my backup Canon 20D for now (my new Canon 5D mkII arrives on Tuesday and my 5D mkI was fedexed for repair on Friday), it means I'll have to settle for a very noisy (the 20D has a lot of digital grain at high ISO numbers) picture.  That's OK, though.  A "grainy" moon pic is better than no moon pic in my book!  

Labels:

Friday, June 5, 2009

artists aren't businessmen...

I hate the contract negotiation part of photography... especially when thousands and thousands of dollars are being discussed.  I'm not a great businessman, I'm an artist.  I want to make moving, emotional images.  I don't want to negotiate rights and figures.  

Unfortunately, I have to.  If I don't play hardball as a business professional, I'll get walked all over...  I'll get taken advantage of.  Even when I try my hardest, it can be difficult getting what I deserve for my craft.  Only the biggest nationally and internationally known photographers can really push the major record labels around.  The rest of us have to cross our fingers and brace for impact, if you know what I mean.  

Luckily, there are several people at these huge corporations that actually have a heart and seem like genuinely nice people.  Even though they are watching the company's bottom line, they don't want to screw anyone over.  I've had one or two clients a long time ago that were really looking to bleed me dry; but, quite often I deal with real people who understand we are all trying to make a decent living.  

I guess I'm just venting to relieve some stress right now.  I always get worried when a LOT of money is on the line for a shoot.  I have a family to feed and don't want to mess anything up.  This is really the hardest part of a photography business.  

At this level of the game, the picture taking is easy.  I've been doing it since the mid-1990's and have learned what needs to be done to take a great photo.  But man, that whole contract/money/rights negotiation thing never seems to get any easier or less stressful.  I wish it would.

Labels:

Thursday, June 4, 2009

Another reason to join the ASMP...

I just bought a new Canon 5D mkII and a few misc items I was needing from B&H Photo.  Since I'm an ASMP member, I get a discount.  This is what my final receipt said:

Total  $2,890.21 
ASMP Savings  $55.78  

I sure don't mind saving an extra $55 off their already low price!  Thank you ASMP...  thank you very much.

Labels:

I don't want to talk about it...

I broke my 5D tonight.  I did it.  I was trying out a new DIY lens idea that I've had brewing for a long time.  The lens idea worked fine, but I did something stupid while testing it.  I had a small piece of newspaper near the lens mount and I guess it got caught on the mirror and hit the shutter.  

One of the shutter blades kinked and became torn where it mounts to the motor that moves it.  It is temporarily toast.  I'll describe the gruesome details below...  

OK, so here's the deal.  I tested the DIY lens apparatus, and it was working OK, but it had a lot of light leaks.  This image looks so orange and soft, because part of the device is made of a think yellow plastic.  It was allowing a lot of light to sneak inside.  It's actually a pretty cool effect, but not what I was looking for.  


So, instead of spray painting the plastic flat black or securing something light proof to it, I ripped off a piece of newspaper and covered it.  It worked fine when i tested it with some tilt/shift in this pic.

Now for the moment of truth (aka - the $300 mistake).  I accidentally let a corner of the newsprint slip inside my camera body.  It hit the mirror, and it must've hit the shutter blades.  This is the image I got - along with a strange noise and an error code.


Everything seemed to be working fine, and I didn't think anything of the mistake.  This picture looked "almost" normal.  I say almost, because you see a tiny bright spot in the upper right corner of the pic.


Then it got worse.  Now I get the horrible bright corner, which I eventually figured out was torn shutter blade.  Not good.  Not good at all.


I found a recent thread online about replacing the shutter in the 5D and a few people have been quoted right at $300 from Canon.  I guess everyone makes mistakes, but do they have to be $300 mistakes?

Labels:

Canon 5D mkII and video...

While researching a potential client that I want to work for, I found this online:  


It's a nice little article talking about the Canon 5D mkII being used on some pretty cool video projects.  You should read it.

Labels:

Car or Camera?

Seriously... for $13k in cash, you could get a halfway decent automobile.  It might be a few years old, or it might be a very basic, economy car.  Either way, you could still pick up a very reliable and very nice car for that kind of money.  

Your other option?  This:  



The image above was taken from this Hasselblad promotion:  


Now, if I could, I'd be dropping the wheelbarrow full of bills off at the local camera store today.  I'd love to have a medium format digital at home!  You can rent them for shoots, but you'll pay for it in a couple dozen rentals.  If you have the need for one a bunch, buying it just seems more logical.  I, however, don't have a NEED for one... just a WANT for one.  A burning desire for one.  So, for now it will remain on my wish list.  


Labels:

Monday, June 1, 2009

Talented kids...

lakehighlands-dallas.blackwhiteread.com/view/article/10782  

Just thought I'd share this video I recently did of an elementary school talent show.  I know, it's not like doing a documentary on the Rolling Stones, but it was still fun.  And who knows... one of these kids could be the next big thing!

Labels: ,